Officials normally use this device to record the speed of vehicles and come back with papers showing that it has been used, properly calibrated and maintained for a certain period of time. In their court testimony, officers must explain exactly how they came to the speeding point. Officers are generally good – they are respected by the courts and their testimony tends to be strong, so they have no incentive to lie. Some judges believe that speeding can provide a reason to do something else.
You do not have to testify that you have used this method, but you will. They won’t lie about speed, for example.
For example, if you are using a radar gun, you must provide a calibration certificate for the radar guns which shows that it has been calibrated for a certain period by someone who is qualified to calibrate it accurately. If the official does not have this, it is possible that he behaves in such a way that his statement is thrown out, and then the case is dismissed. Although his words appear to be strong, he has much more evidence on his side to support his view. There is no evidence for this. The only thing you have is his word, not the words of the policeman himself.
Stationary radars and LIDAR are considered to be extremely accurate when properly calibrated and maintained. All traffic instruments used in Virginia Beach were “extremely precise,” he said. If an official can prove that he has a calibration certificate showing that the device is working properly, no one can drive too fast as a result.
This means that if a lawyer can prove otherwise, there is no reason not to accept it in court as valid evidence. The defense for LIDAR is generally the same as for radars. This includes ensuring that the devices work properly and are calibrated to ensure their accuracy. This is particularly often the case in heavy traffic, as LidAR devices must be kept very quiet in order to lock the right objects correctly.
The speed in the Virginia Beach speed violation case was when a law enforcement officer targeted a vehicle believed to be traveling too fast, got behind the vehicle and adjusted the driver’s speed. After adjusting the speed, the officer looked at his speedometer to determine how fast the vehicle was traveling. Speed 30 is definitely a controversial method and may seem like a less reliable measure of speed, but it is still admissible as evidence of speed in Virginia Beach courts. People are often surprised when they learn that it is not so easy to allow such a thing as speed in court, especially when there are problems related to the official’s own operating error. For example, if an official approaches a driver slowly and does not notice, he can look at his speedometer, which may not register as fast as the driver is actually driving. In these situations, it is important to work with a lawyer who knows how to challenge officers “statements and to cast reasonable doubt on the accuracy of the indictment.